Sunday, 4 March 2012

Keep Calm and Carry On

The Independent on Sunday is the only paper today keeping the story going.  "Further No. 10 link to A4e" says the headline, linking the departure of Cameron's advisor Steve Hilton with the appointment of Harrison as "families champion".  Hilton recommended her, they say.  And they describe the £250k contract given to A4e last September.  "A4e is advising No 10 on the next wave of privatisation. It will offer advice on "value for money" in contracting out, including writing guidelines on future privatisations. The firm will hold a seminar in Whitehall explaining how to design welfare contracts with private firms. .......... The Cabinet Office hired A4e to advise on four experimental schemes to help families with unemployed parents. All are in Conservative-led authorities: Hammersmith & Fulham, Westminster, Birmingham and Leicestershire.  A4e is not running the schemes, but is helping the Government write the rules on how they should work. They are based on social impact bonds, the Government's 'big idea' for privatising welfare. Investors and banks will pay private companies to help poor families. The taxpayer will then pay them back over years for the supposed 'savings'.  A4e is being asked to advise how to stop welfare firms taking money for poor performance. Yet A4e has often been found to be a poor performer itself."  
When A4e's main website went down recently there were some of us who felt that it was the result of a decision to revamp the site as part of an image makeover.  But no.  It's back, with no changes.  Even the link to "Emma's blog" is there on the home page, even though it hasn't been updated since last November.  Andrew Dutton has posted a response to the various accusations, and he ends with a note on "A4e and Emma Harrison".  "As a result of Emma Harrison’s resignation, announced on 24 February, she is no longer a Director or Chairman of A4e which means she cannot participate at Board meetings. The governance of A4e has therefore changed with immediate effect and decisions relating to future dividend policy will be determined by the Board under a new, independent non-executive Chairman. In addition, Emma’s salary as Chairman and Director and payments made by A4e in respect of Thornbridge Hall have ceased."  So who made the decisions about dividends before?  And that last bit about Thornbridge Hall is interesting.  The Board are really seeking to distance themselves from the woman who still owns most of the company.
But back to the websites.  The MyA4e site looks like something designed by professionals who have no clear idea of who their target audience is.  One could say the same about the multitude of other sites set up by A4e.  There's A4e Voicewhich is a blog for good news items.  The latest, posted on 2 March, is aimed at refuting the criticisms of A4e for using clients in work experience roles in its own company.  Then there's A4e Transitions which is an arm of the company which provides services to companies which are making lots of people redundant.  Very different is A4e Careers which apparently seeks to recruit people to work for the company.  It's a mess, with cartoons, handwriting-style fonts and all the familiar slogans.  Much more sober is the Direct payments for social care site.   Eleven local authorities contract with A4e to deliver this service.  Then there's A4e Skills which is "the direct delivery arm for vocational learning, delivering Apprenticeship programmes, work based learning (QCF & NVQ's), in-house training and vocationally related courses, accredited courses including e learning courses.  Most training takes place within the workplace, working flexibly to meet the needs of both organisations and individuals."  Finally there's A4e Insight,  their "research and consultancy arm".  This is where the line between private company and public sector becomes dangerously blurred.
I've almost certainly missed some of A4e's numerous websites.  But what they show is a confusion about image, despite the vast amounts of money A4e has spent on PR over the years.  Will the aim now be to shun the limelight, stop provoking the natural response to hype, and just buckle down to making money?  
By the way, Emma Harrison is a trustee of the Eden Project, which is currently having to lay off staff because of financial difficulties.


  1. "A4e is being asked to advise how to stop welfare firms taking money for poor performance. Yet A4e has often been found to be a poor performer itself." Quite.

    "A spokesman for A4e said: "A4e has performed consistently at or above industry average across all major employability programmes."" Unfortunately, though, "industry average" seems to be significantly lower than was promised.

  2. Will Emma still get her dividends from a4e? In which case she probably wouldn't sell her shares .....

    1. Will A4E survive for long enough to enable it to pay Emma any more dividends?

      From what I've been reading in the Press recently, it sounds like the DWP's bosses in Whitehall have had the knives out for Emma and her company for some time. The DWP's Mandarins have been shouted down repeatedly, for several years, by eager politicians who have not had a clue but who love all the Power & Patronage etc.

      The "whole of Government Review" that Cameron says he has ordered might just be a truck-load of whitewash or Whitehall might seize their own chance to get revenge on Emma Harrison and A4E, I suspect.

  3. Do we actually know the current state of play with A4E? I mean, Margaret Hodge demanded all new contracts be 'blocked' until investigations with A4E are concluded and Cameron appears to have ordered some sort of vague internal review - but I can find nothing definitve to say that new contract offers have been withheld or withdrawn or anything (I'm thinking the new one for prison education in London and the probation one in the North East) No-one wants to say anything although the contract holders should have been named by now AND no-one from A4E answers any queries - everything referred to press department where "commercial-in-confidence" seems the response.

    Also, why is the company making such a big deal over separating itself from Emma Harrison when no serious charges have been levelled against her (greedy, vain, celebrity-loving, hype-spreading and poor dress sense are not offences!) but against the company conduct making the possibility of fraud almost inevitable? Is there something we still don't know?

  4. Following on from the story about A4e being awarded a contract to advise Cabinet Office on establishing contracts using social impact bonds, I’ve heard that in one of the authorities involved (Hammersmith and Fulham), A4e are lining themselves up to deliver one of these contracts! The scheme would target offenders with drug addictions.
    This seems to be a significant conflict of interest: advising on contracts, before delivering them – and using public money to do so in both cases.
    Not sure whether this has made the press?

  5. im disgusted that emma harrison is still listed as a trustee at eden! just how have eden profited from this connection? my mate lost his job in the 'reorganisation'. interestingly there volunteer dept. has been virtually wiped out! they where taking people from dwp?! whole thing stinks


Keep it clean, please. No abusive comments will be approved, so don't indulge in insults. If you wish to contact me, post a comment beginning with "not for publication".