Wednesday, 10 September 2014

The outsourcing scandal revealed

When it was revealed that G4S and Serco had been overcharging by millions on the offender tagging contracts we were assured by Chris Grayling that they would be barred from bidding for any more contracts until a thorough investigation had been carried out (including an investigation by the Serious Fraud Office).  But then, a few days after G4S were pronounced "cleared" (though not be the SFO)
they were included in the list of bidders for the probation contracts - so they must have been tendering while supposedly barred.  Well, it's now clear; they were never barred in the first place.  That's just one of the revelations to come out of the latest hearings of the Public Accounts Committee.  As the Guardian reported on Monday, the chair of the PAC, Margaret Hodge, was shocked.  The hearings continued today, and the shambles which outsourcing has become was laid bare.  Two of the top civil servants in the procurement area are fairly new in the job, and have bags of experience.  They were interviewed today, and said they had found that the people doing the work didn't have the skills, experience or competence for the job.  There was no contract management.  Applications to vary the contracts were numerous, and with one particular contract there had been so many that no one could now remember what the original contract specified.  Basically (although they didn't put it like this) the companies have been running rings round the government.
There is obviously a lot more to come out about specific contracts.  Right at the end Margaret Hodge reduced the G4S chap to quivering silence when she demanded to know if it was true that in the probation contracts it was specified that if the contract was terminated by either side before it was completed, the company would get the full amount of the contract.  Apparently it is true - and she didn't like it.
The last Labour government started this outsourcing bonanza.  When the coalition got in they didn't stop to find out whether the competence was there to do it; they just went ahead and outsourced everything that hadn't already been flogged off.  And we have been paying the price.

8 comments:

  1. Rupert Soames, the Eton & Oxford-educated current chairman of Serco, is the brother of Nicholas Soames, the Tory MP:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rupert_Soames

    The Tory troughers are at it again, it seems to me.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sick of the Work Programme11 September 2014 at 02:17

    A4e has this week been heavily criticised by a former inmate who appeared in front of the Justice Select Committee. The allegation is that A4e's head of education would not give him the green light to act as a literacy mentor for two inmates, despite him already having received specific training to do this: http://www.eadt.co.uk/news/hollesley_jail_s_education_provider_extremely_disappointed_over_evidence_given_by_former_inmate_and_prison_reformer_1_3764046

    ReplyDelete
  3. Grayling needs to resign. When he bars G4s and Serco from bidding for new contracts And then they tender for new contracts whilst supposedly barred, then he is either plainly incompetent or simply does not give a damn about what these companies get up to.

    Not to dissimilar to his lax performance as Employment Minister a few years ago on CH4 News. The presenter, Cathy Newman challenged Grayling on whether MWA was indeed mandatory. Grayling said no, contradicting the on air testimonies of jobseekers minutes earlier. But these were weasel words. Because Cathy Newman had in her very hand a letter sent to several thousand jobseekers telling them that MWA was indeed mandatory! Of course, Grayling feigned ignorance and had the gall to ask ''I hope you're not calling me a liar?''. I know what I'd have called him!

    ReplyDelete
  4. There's a good write-up in the Guardian here: http://goo.gl/2MVNGP

    ReplyDelete
  5. The Banks screwed up and those that are less well off paid,then labelled as scroungers.

    The WP Providers are given vast amounts of Taxpayer funds,fail to meet even the minimum requirements of their contracts,lie,cheat and steal. The unemployed are once again blamed as being shiftless and unwilling to engage (In what is still in that Black Box) solution? Throw more money at them,just like the Bankers and heap more blame on the unemployed.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Pants on fire? (Never mind can always get some more on ex's):
    http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/sep/12/iain-duncan-smith-feckless-layabouts-work-shy

    ReplyDelete
  7. Historian,I have noticed you have not been posting,hope all is well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, yes, I've been indisposed. I'll be posting soon.

      Delete

Keep it clean, please. No abusive comments will be approved, so don't indulge in insults. If you wish to contact me, post a comment beginning with "not for publication".